Knowledge is Justified True Belief

The Tripartite Analysis of Knowledge

The tripartite analysis of knowledge has been held by many philosophers throughout history and its origin can be traced all the way back to Plato's discussion of a tripartite analysis of knowledge in the Theaetetus. There are three components to the traditional analysis of knowledge; i.e, the truth condition, the belief condition and the justification condition.

Let's go through them one by one: -

The Truth Condition

According to the tripartite analysis of knowledge, a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the proposition p is true.

Nonetheless, sometimes what is false cannot be known, and something’s truth does not require that anyone can know or prove that it is true.

Not all truths are established truths. If you flip a coin and never check how it landed, it may be true that it landed heads, even if nobody has any way to tell.

Truth is a metaphysical, as opposed to epistemological. It (truth) is a matter of how things are, not how they can be shown to be. So when we say that only true things can be known, we’re not saying anything about how anyone can access the truth.

The Belief Condition

The tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the person S believes the proposition p.

The belief condition is also controversial. The idea behind the belief condition is that you can only know what you believe. When you fail to believe in something means you do not know it. “Belief” in this context means full belief.

The Justification Condition

The tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the person S is justified in believing the proposition p.

This relates to the justification condition in Plato’s Dialogue, Theaetetus, when Socrates in the dialogue points out that “true opinion” is in general insufficient for knowledge. The true opinion need to be justified with an account.

Thus, the tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a subject S knows the proposition p if and only if

proposition p is true;
subject S believes proposition p;
subject S is justified in believing the proposition p.

By analysing knowledge using such method means that we are stating the conditions that are individually necessary and jointly sufficient for the propositional knowledge.

Knowledge could only be considered as true if it could fulfill the three conditions.

Bibliography

Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins and Matthias Steup, "The Analysis of Knowledge", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/>.

Comments

What is Entrepreneurship (Part II)

Continued from What is Entrepreneurship (Part I) Traits of a successful entrepreneur From the last write-up in What is Entrepreneurship (Part I) , we understood that entrepreneurs undertake risks , carry out new combinations of innovations , able to make decisions and possess needs for achievements . Successful entrepreneurs possess personality traits that motivates them in their entrepreneurship activities. According to Chell et al. (1991), many of the character traits found to be significant in entrepreneurs are similar to the character traits of other successful people. Entrepreneurs are a special kind of people that possess pertinent traits which drives them to success. They are motivated internally and externally . Their internal motivating factors are their personal goals, need for achievement and ambition; while the external factors come from compulsion to sustain living, support from others, looking at exemplar successful entrepreneurs, having access to capital and retaining

Definitions

What is definition We found that language can be a very complicated instrument for human communication. If words are used carelessly or by mistake, the instrument could be burdensome to us. Vagueness and ambiguity may cause misunderstandings and misuse of words. Vagueness means the quality of the expression of language is not being clearly stated or understood. Ambiguity means that the quality of an expression whose meaning can be taken in two or more ways. Misunderstandings and misuse of words could cause disagreements and in turn, disputes. There are three different kinds of disputes . The first is obviously genuine dispute , whereby the parties explicitly and unambiguously disagree, either in belief or attitude. The second is merely verbal dispute , where there is no genuine disagreement between the parties. Yet, there happen to be disagreements; perhaps due to misunderstanding or misuse of language. The third is apparently verbal but really genuine . When the parties mis

Knowledge (Part II)

Continued from Knowledge (Part I) Knowledge is the gathered understanding or awareness derived from accumulation of information, facts, concepts or skills by means of learning and experience. It provides us with the ability to utilise information and skills for making decisions, solving problems and also understanding the world. Besides of what was revealed in the Holy Quran about knowledge ( in Part 1 ), early Western philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and many more have defined knowledge in their own terms. Socrates was born circa 470 BCE in Athens and died 399 BCE. He had a unique perspective on knowledge. Despite being credited as the founder of Western philosophy, Socrates had written nothing and all information about him was gained second-hand. His thoughts were obtained through dialogues with his pupils. Socrates had emphasised on knowledge all his life. He believed that true knowledge could only be obtained through a process of inquiry, questioning

Shaharudin menulis...

Search This Blog