Skip to main content

Knowledge is Justified True Belief

The Tripartite Analysis of Knowledge

The tripartite analysis of knowledge has been held by many philosophers throughout history and its origin can be traced all the way back to Plato's discussion of a tripartite analysis of knowledge in the Theaetetus. There are three components to the traditional analysis of knowledge; i.e, the truth condition, the belief condition and the justification condition.

Let's go through them one by one: -

The Truth Condition

According to the tripartite analysis of knowledge, a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the proposition p is true.

Nonetheless, sometimes what is false cannot be known, and something’s truth does not require that anyone can know or prove that it is true. 

Not all truths are established truths. If you flip a coin and never check how it landed, it may be true that it landed heads, even if nobody has any way to tell. 

Truth is a metaphysical, as opposed to epistemological. It (truth) is a matter of how things are, not how they can be shown to be. So when we say that only true things can be known, we’re not saying anything about how anyone can access the truth.

  

The Belief Condition

The tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the person S believes the proposition p.

The belief condition is also controversial. The idea behind the belief condition is that you can only know what you believe. When you fail to believe in something means you do not know it. “Belief” in this context means full belief.


The Justification Condition

The tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a person S can only know the subject of a proposition p if and only if the person S is justified in believing the proposition p.

This relates to the justification condition in Plato’s Dialogue, Theaetetus, when Socrates in the dialogue points out that “true opinion” is in general insufficient for knowledge. The true opinion need to be justified with an account. 


Thus, the tripartite analysis of knowledge states that a subject S knows the proposition p if and only if

  1. proposition p is true;
  2. subject S believes proposition p;
  3. subject S is justified in believing the proposition p.


By analysing knowledge using such method means that we are stating the conditions that are individually necessary and jointly sufficient for the propositional knowledge.

Knowledge could only be considered as true if it could fulfill the three conditions.


Bibliography

Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins and Matthias Steup, "The Analysis of Knowledge", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/>.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge (Part II)

Continued from Knowledge (Part I)  Knowledge is the gathered understanding or awareness derived from accumulation of information, facts, concepts or skills by means of learning and experience. It provides us with the ability to utilise information and skills for making decisions, solving problems and also understanding the world. Besides of what was revealed in the Holy Quran about knowledge ( in Part 1 ), early Western philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes and many more have defined knowledge in their own terms. Socrates was  born circa 470 BCE in Athens and died  399  BCE. He had a unique perspective on knowledge. Despite being credited as the founder of Western philosophy, Socrates had written nothing and all information about him was gained second-hand. His thoughts were obtained through dialogues with his pupils. Socrates had emphasised on knowledge all his life.  He believed that true knowledge could only be obtained through a pr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knowledge (Part III)

Continued from Knowledge (Part II)   In discussing about knowledge, we cannot ignore the contributions of Aristotle.  Aristotle, the ancient Greek philosopher, had a different view of knowledge compared to his teacher, Plato. Aristotle believed that knowledge is not just a matter of understanding the eternal truths of the world, but it is also a matter of understanding the natural world through empirical observation and investigation. Aristotle believed that knowledge is derived from experience and acquired through a process of observation, classification, and analysis. To him, all knowledge begins with sensory experience, and only through that experience, people get to know of the particular qualities of things in this world. Yet, Aristotle also believed that true knowledge involves more than just observations of individual instances; knowledge requires the identification of general principles or universal truths that underlie the particular instances. This process of general...
Post a Comment
Read more